Tuesday, January 21, 2020
A Dollââ¬â¢s House - Nora Essay example -- English Literature
Nora is the central character in the book A Dollââ¬â¢s House and it is through her that Ibsen develops many of his themes To what extent is loyalty shown by the lead female characters characters? What are the consequences of this? Within these two books loyalty is a minor theme and one that is easily missed, indeed it is narrow. However, it is still one which weaves a thread through both of the books encompassing major and minor characters, the material and the abstract. In commencing this discussion one must first refer to the definition of the word ââ¬Å"loyaltyâ⬠; the quality of being loyal. As defined in the Cambridge dictionary, loyal: firm and not changing in your friendship with or support for a person or an organization, or in your belief in your principles. And in the Collins dictionary, loyalty: faithful; a feeling of friendship or duty towards someone or something. Nora is the central character in the book ââ¬Å"A Dollââ¬â¢s Houseâ⬠and it is through her that Ibsen develops many of his themes, one of these being the difficulty of maintaining an individual personality within the confines of a social role/stereotype. Initially Nora seems devoted to her marriage and her husband, ââ¬Å"I would never dream of doing anything you didnââ¬â¢t want me toâ⬠. We see the sacrifices sheââ¬â¢s made to keep what she has intact and her beloved alive. To all intents and purposes she is the model of loyalty. She appears to be utterly in love with Torvald, she ââ¬Å"looks incredulouslyâ⬠at Mrs.Linde, ââ¬Å"But, Kristine, is that possible?â⬠, when faced with the prospect that someone could be or ever have been in a loveless marriage. Sheââ¬â¢s proud of her husband, ââ¬Å"My husband has just been made Bank Manager!â⬠, and queen to please him, ââ¬Å"Oh, thank you, than... ...for some miracle. In this she loses her greatest financial asset and her home. These two characters both show signs of strong loyalty but both in different ways and to different things. Subsequently, the consequences for both are extremely different. Nora, in ââ¬Å"A Dollââ¬â¢s Houseâ⬠, through her questioning of her marital relationship and the resulting recognition of false values, manages to achieve the prospect of self awareness and development; this is a direct consequence of her eventual loyalty to herself. Ranyevskayaââ¬â¢s loyalties, on the other hand, lead to her downfall. The combination of her personal loyalties, her enslavement to emotions of which extravagance is the consequence, and her loyalty to the past which results in the denial of the present, can be seen as the two greatest personal factors that are responsible for her loss of the Cherry Orchard.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.