Ethical Dilemma & Code of Ethics-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: learn how to make decisions in various ethical situations. Understand who you are and how you relate to others in both your personal and work life can make you aware of the values that are important to you as well as the values that you may need to work on to improve your professional standing. Answer: Ethical dilemma occurs when an individual has to take a decision and he is not sure which option should be selected that is whether he should be in an ethical path or not. Two types of codes are followed while overcoming an ethical dilemma (Dewey, 2016). These are the ACS Code of Professional Conduct and the ACS Codes of Ethics. These two codes of ethics answer the questions of ethical dilemma in the given case study. The organization has clearly taken unethical decisions regarding the scholarship structure. They are being partial towards the students. If I find out such unethical situation in the organization I am working, I will definitely protest against this act. The scholarship structure clearly mentioned about the transparency, however if the deserving candidates will not get the first priority, it is extremely unethical. When I will find out such unethical acts in my organization, I will complain about this to the manager and tell him about my dilemma. I will definitely ask for his advice that what should be done by me (Frederickson Rohr, 2015). If I find out that my manager is not helping me in this situation, I will be a whistle blower and let everyone know about the unethical acts in my organization. According to the ACS Codes of Ethics or ACS Codes of Professional Conduct, there are six values that should be maintained. These six values are as follows:The Primacy of the Public Interest: This value refers to the fact that the public interest should be placed on top of the personal and business interests (Baker, 2014). My organization has not kept the public interest on top and has only looked into their personal interests. Enhancement of Quality of Life: The enhancement of the quality of the life are affected by the work (Maryniak, 2012). My organization is unethical according to this value. Honesty: My organization is not at all honest in their terms and conditions and they are providing scholarship to candidates with lesser marks and which was not mentioned in the conditions. Competence: The stakeholders of the organization have no idea about this disloyalty and only a group of individuals are involved in this unethical act (Baker, 2014) Professional Development: The organization should be professionally developed, however my organization has not developed professionally and neither do the staffs of the organization Professionalism: The professionalism is the most important criteria in any organization (Maryniak, 2012). However, my organization is being professional as they are not following the ethical paths. The above values clearly state that the organization where I am working is being extremely unethical in their terms and conditions and I should protest against these acts. References Baker, R. (2014). Codes of conduct. InHandbook of Global Bioethics(pp. 551-579). Springer Netherlands. Dewey, J. (2016).Ethics. Read Books Ltd. Frederickson, H. G., Rohr, J. A. (2015).Ethics and public administration. Routledge. Maryniak, I. (2012). Codes of conduct.Index on Censorship,41(1), 85-95